Since my cataract surgery, I’ve been doing a lot more e-book reading and just reading in general. The problem I’m finding with e-books, aside the egregious formatting issues, crap editing, awful proofreading, and total lack of spellcheck (Or authors really DON’T know the difference between imminent and eminent or the fact a point is moot, not mute!) is that authors tend to write long novellas or very short books, under 200 pages, that leave characters undeveloped, no time for world building, secondary characters that have great promise become a flash-in-and-out shallow non-entity, and I’m left feeling like that should have been really good, but it ended up little more than a dog’s dinner of a slightly fleshed out outline. Shallow, empty, unable to engage me completely the whole thing is little better than a piece of cotton candy in print.
Reading more has also shown the weaknesses of many highly acclaimed and/or bestselling authors. Take Janet Evonavich. Her most recent bit of fluff, Look Alive Twenty-Five was so bad I ended up skimming it. Trite, reusing sentences and partial paragraphs in every damn book, predictable plots, everything a series that should have retired gracefully 15 books ago becomes, added the final insult – not one thing was truly funny. Her fans will consistently overlook all these flaws and rave about Steph, Morelli, Ranger, and Lula – never looking at the downward spiral of the quality of the plots and increasingly absurd ‘set pieces’ designed as humorous skits within the book, but unrelated to the story. Her fans are rabid, but sales are declining with quality. Evanovich has made her millions, it doesn’t matter. The stories can be on life-support and her ardent fans will buy and rave about them. I get free e-books or I don’t bother. Look Alive Twenty-Five – which gets a D- (0.8*) from me – wasn’t even in the review listing. Why? Her fans just don’t care. As the Bard would say, “There’s the rub.”
There are some real quality authors doing e-books at novel length, but the short attention span of readers seems to push publishers and authors into a short format. Publishers of print books rarely give new authors a chance to build a following. The result is astounding mediocrity. Or as I said to my doctor, “Short and predictable.” There is no greater condemnation than that.
It also says a lot about readers. They will settle for a steady diet of bland ‘fast food’ books rather than take the time to find something worth the effort to read and be willing to wait for a well-crafted novel that is fully visualized and researched with three-dimensional nuanced characters and creative world building. 98% of ebooks are the equivalent of a fast food drive-thru window items thrown together by people who know nothing about food, managed by people who care only about time (not taste), owned by a soulless company, and consumed by people indifferent to anything except a quick refueling of their stomach. The meal is forgettable and tasteless but they can claim they ate something resembling food.
Why this rant? Well, as I said, I’ve been reading more, sometimes 15 books in a series in 3 days – yeah they’re that short! You quickly realize that every genre has been infected. UF, paranormal, and cozy mysteries have a pandemic of lousy books. Not far behind are books that ‘borrow’ a character or element from a bestselling author and spin empty stories around them. One of the worst offenders is The Jack Reacher Cases by Dan Ames. Ghastly is giving them too much credit. I began reading Lee Child’s Jack Reacher books before anyone knew who Lee Child was or heard of Jack Reacher. Jack Reacher, like Robert B. Parker’s Spencer, became an iconic character. Why Lee Child allowed the use of his character as a plot point is beyond me. The books are so badly written and plotted (There was a PLOT????) they can’t even be called average. AVOID THIS SERIES! Oh yeah, avoid Diane Capri’s The Hunt for Jack Reacher series too. She still hasn’t found a decent plot or a coherent story.
Seeley James, an action thriller writer of average or slightly above skill, start the Sabel Security series. I had issues from book one but gave the author time to develop the characters and the over-arching plot. I tell you, the whole concept was so OTT I struggled from book 1, but Book 5, Death and Secrets had me once again trying to figure out how to throw an ebook against the wall in outraged frustration. The heroine is the owner of Sabel Security, a business started by her adopted billionaire father and named for her. Pia Sabel isn’t just a former world-class Olympic soccer champion, she’s natural at security and working out arcane plots. Yes, she even learns her REAL momma is now the evil VP of the US! So a soccer champion heiress turned security company president and field operator (with zero experience) not only outwits all these super-villains, she looks great doing it and teaches kids soccer when she can! BARF! The books ranged from D to C+ (2-3.2*) and only if you suspend all credibility. If you can get past Element 42 (good luck with that) it doesn’t get worse till book 4 and 5 and that’s where I gave up.
Now you know I had some good reads too. Here they are:
Kill for Me (Victor, Bk 8) by Tom Wood gets a solid B+ (4.2*) recommended read from me. Victor the assassin remains steadfastly in character through the series, adhering only to his own ethics while hunting and being hunted. A fascinating character, not likable but not repulsive either. Tom Wood does a fine job keeping his plots tight and interesting. A recommended series for anyone who enjoys the anti-hero genre.
Fortune Furlough by Jana DeLeon sees Ida Belle, Gertie, and Fortune off on that long talked about vacation in Florida on a fictitious island called Quiet Key – which has a geographical description that seems to move it around but sounds like Sanibel/Captiva mixed with Little Palm Island (wrong location, right rescription) and Longboat Key (same problem). Other than that, the plot is pretty good and there are enough laughs that you can enjoy the mystery of who killed the conman. It gets a B- (3.8*) as it’s still not quite up to the early books but is an easy, fun read.
In a Badger Way is Shelly Laurenston’s latest shifter humorous romance and bless that author, she does make me laugh. We were introduced to the MacKenzie sisters in Hot and Badgered that featured the oldest half-sister Charlie. This installment features Stevie, the neurotic musical and scientific genius. Stevie is not one of my favorite characters, but the book is fun and funny and loveable Panda Shen Li who we met way back in Bite Me. Stevie decides Shen is her boyfriend. He simply has little say in the matter, even after seeing what she shifts into. But pandas are among the most easy-going shifters so, in many ways, Shen is Stevie’s best choice and truth be told, he’s not exactly averse to the idea. Good fun with the usual slam-bang ending. It gets a solid B (4*) and recommended read from me.
One of the series I gang read is still in progress, the Ascending Mage series by Frank and Rae Lea Hurt. Book 1, Changeling Justice starts the story of Ember Wright, the younger daughter of two high ranking mages, her father who works with numbers for the Counsel, and her mother, a Class 5 Healer. As a child, she shows no talents at all. Come he testing day Ember is ready to declare herself a lost cause, but the man doing the testing is the most respected Investigator alive, called by one and all, The Legend. While all mage tracks have 6 levels, Investigators have only 3. And that is what Emmy is, an investigator. The story starts with her apprenticing with The Legend himself. They are chasing a culprit in a cemetery when Ember says the name of the person whose gravestone she tripped over – and calls forth his ghost. Wallace knows she’s far more than a simple investigator and is carefully guarding her secret. When she reaches Senor status in just 10 years, he sends her to Minot to do the census of Dru – mages and changelings and things go sidewise from the start. Ember becomes relentless in her pursuit for justice and with her mentor so far off she finds another one in the cemetery and the real plot begins unfolding through Changeling Hunter and Buried Truth. So far the series is getting B- to B (3.8 to 4.0*) from me and book 4 is on pre-order. It’s a definite cut above the typical UF fluff.
OK, that it for now and I’ll try and do more series reviews in a month or so and update any here I’m still reading.
Paperback Swap (PBS)
Tags: commentary, Editorial, Paperback Swap, PBS
With some trepidation and a feeling that the site was withering on the vine, I returned to PBS. I played in some swap games and argued with folks on the political affairs forum – and then a very strange thing happened.
PBS showed the site was not secure. They corrected the login page and swear the kiosk where they sell junk is safe but ………………… well, nothing else is. Now being somewhat security conscious while keeping in mind there isn’t much there that’s correct, I pressed them a bit and was contacted by a woman in the IT department and assured the site with our names and addresses and all manner of private info being exchanged by what PBS calls, incorrectly, ‘Private Messaging’ was getting converted to a secure site. I began making deletions and changes. I also posted two threads, one on the political forum and on on the general chat forum warning folks about the security issues. PBS naturally came in and “Oh dear, it was just us forgetting to pay the fee for the security for an hour or so. All is well.” When I pointed out all but the Login was unsecured, they came back with ‘how hard it was to changes everything to https format’.
Now, remember, most of us are PAID members. I’m not on a ‘free’ site anymore and haven’t been for 3 years. And in 3 years they haven’t managed to secure the site. I was not impressed.
BUT WAIT! THERE’S MORE!
A stranger wanders into tiny little Current Affairs and Politics (CAAP) forum and starts a thread. The thread title “THOU SHALL NOT BEAR FALSE WITNESS”. No, that is not a joke. Some complete twit actually had the unmitigated temerity to use a Biblical quote, and not just any old quote, one of the Ten Commandments. Apparently, the poster, Len, uses a rather modern bible as the quote is normally “Thou SHALT not bear false witness….” Now I am an agnostic and knew both those things, and also knew the commandment had to do with perjury more than general falsehoods although they too are covered. But he posted a somewhat questionable graph and article about the number lies Trump has told vs Obama. Now these ‘lies’ are not weighted in any way, a deliberate oft-repeated whopper like ‘If you like your insurance, you can keep your insurance!’ vs cheating on your golf score or lying about your weight both equaled 1.
It also did not count how many time the answer was evaded, side-stepped, responded to with a non-sequitur, or simply ignored. Obama was a master at those things. Trump’s mouth is in gear before he thinks. Never give a straight answer when and equivocation will do. Chris Wray, Director of the FBI, did that by constantly saying, “We’ll wait for the Inspector General’s report,” to question from Committee members. (I’m not counting on living that many years.)
So there’s a bit of back and forth – and I even eschewed remarking on this thread title and then I thought, “What the hell is a PBS Team Member who has extensive access with the powers that be doing on a political forum? This doesn’t seem right. It’s like a judge dating one of the lawyers trying a case in his court.” hummmmm So I am extremely uncomfortable. All the forum members have different jobs and experiences and a wide variety of expertise and life experience, but there we are all equal. A PBS Team Member is an insider with access none of us have to both personal information and people in power. This bothers me. If he wishes to engage in political debate, he should go to a site where he too is naught but an equal. There are thousands to choose from.
Thinking about this more bothered me enough to send an email to Richard Pickering, the nominal owner of PBS. I get a reply from the ever-anonymous, and super secret, and feared employee, The Librarian. All these years and no one has ever ‘come out’ and admitted to being The Librarian. Speculation is rampant. Perhaps they get taken by a demon if caught out and new Librarian appointed. Now one does not bandy words with The Librarian. Well, except me.
After politely expressing my concerns to Mr Pickering, who ignored me, his loyal minion wrote:
Dear xxxxx,
The Team is usually far too busy to participate in Forums; we have no policy against it, though.
Len is our head programmer. He is an integral part of the Team, and we know him to be invariably gracious, patient, genial, kind, well-informed, and very highly intelligent. Without reading any of his recent posts, we strongly believe that if he has chosen to participate in the Discussion Forums, those who encounter his posts should consider themselves fortunate to have his contribution to the discussion.
As long as Len is being courteous, we don’t know why it would make you uncomfortable to have him participate in Forums. He is not your “boss” — he does not actually close accounts or reprimand members (although he *could* do those kinds of things, he is far too busy keeping the site running, and overseeing members is not his responsibility). Also, if you are doing something in Forums that you fear will get you “in trouble”, you should not be doing it! 🙂
It’s also wise to bear in mind that any member of the Team, or any member of the club, can “lurk” in any Forum at any time (meaning, read without posting), so you should not consider any communications there to be privileged or private. You should not be sharing anything in Discussion Forums that you aren’t comfortable with anyone (Team member or not) reading.
Luckily, there is an easy solution if you don’t like Len’s posts: you can click “Ignore this member” on one of them, and you will not see them anymore. It would be a shame in our opinion — you would be passing up an opportunity to learn something — but that is your choice! Also, if it makes you uncomfortable to have one of the Team participate in a particular discussion, you can always recuse yourself from that particular topic and let a few days pass; chances are good that Len won’t have the leisure time again for a good while, and there are plenty of other discussion topics in which to participate.
Of course, if you feel that Len has been discourteous or abusive, please specify the text to which you object and give us a link, and we’ll look into it!
All the best,
The PaperBackSwap Team